Miami Symposium : flash
FLASH!!!
In
Buenos Aires:
Our
colleagues
from Argentina
get
ready
for
the Miami
Symposium…
Review By Catery
Tato
This way, it is announced that the Symposium, which is open to everyone, will have the presence of colleagues from the different Schools of the World Association of Psychoanalysis. Jacques Alain Miller’s presence at the conference proves its significance, and the interest of the World Association of Psychoanalysis (WAP) in this event. Four papers were presented on the evening of Wednesday, April 10th at the Escuela de la Orientación Lacaniana in Buenos Aires (School of Lacanian Orientation).
Mariela Yern, in her paper titled “FEMENEIDAD” (Femininity) takes us through the path treaded by “ponderous men” who based their work on Freud’s research, down into the findings of men in the present who from a position of “romantic Ideal love for the pornography of jouissance,” ask how a woman enjoys herself. Different answers are found in the process known as “the attempt to deal with the sexual reality.” This stems from the Freudian thesis about feminine sexuality and its counterpoint with the Lacanian voice, who says that women do speak but they don’t say it all, situating “a feminine jouissance that is not all.”
Next
followed Daniela
Fernandez’s
paper “THE
FUTURE EVE.”
In Lacan’s
literary
references,
Fernandez has
found a quote in
which he
acknowledges
Maurice
Merleau-Ponty
for his
development on
the subject and
problematic of
femininity. “The
eye made so as
not to see” ,
“the feminine
figure of the
novel Future
Eve” by Auguste
Villiers de
L’Isle-Adam and
“the
artist” which
Lacan situates
in contrast to
Eve who sees it
all point out to
the
vertexes that
converge in the
different ways
of attempting to
seize the
essence of the
feminine, while
cropping
out the
“extraction of
the object a”.
Fernandez
states, “If we
reflect on
Lacan’s quote,
we can ask
ourselves what
methods
Villiers, the
artist, uses to
leave
us at the mercy
of the access to
the impossible
to unveil that
makes up the
object a.”
The third
paper, from Debora
Nitzcaner “
WHY TALK TO A
WOMAN?,”
unfolds and
explores three
questions about
the feminine in
the clinical
field
and concludes
with two
testimonies by
male school
analysts (SA) .
What do
analysts say
about feminine
jouissance? What
does a woman
want? What does
a
woman know?
These were the
three scansions
presented. The
first one
discusses a
dialogue in the
film “Talk to
her,” to situate
the Fundamental
Fantasy in a
woman. The
second scansion
deals with a
quote by Lacan,
which says, “no
one bears
being not-all”
which
demonstrates
“the tie of a
woman in her way
of addressing
the phallus.”It
then concludes,
surrounding the
“impossible-to-be-said,”
in the
silence of the
feminine
jouissance as
presented in
Luís Tudanca and
Gustavo
Stiglitz’s
testimonies .
This development
points to a
counterpoint
between the
scientific
discussion of
The Future Eve
and how male
analysts allow
themselves
to get caught in
the feminine.
Nicolás Bousoño follows along
with the
clinical
approach
by asking :
“How do women
approach
today’s
psychoanalysis?...As
they always
have: always
differently.”
The title of
his text
“VORACITY”
takes us into
“modern
epidemics”
as well as “to
the voracity
Freud denotes
in the
Superego,
which is
structural.”
His quote
takes us to
the
construction
of the
sinthome as
the
“discontent”
in
civilization.
He discusses
this
discontent
within the
frame of the
case of a
30-year-old
woman who
requires
treatment due
to her
obesity, after
rejecting the
possibility of
undergoing
bariatric
surgery.
Obesity has
marked her
life and
this clinical
vignette shows
the point at
which
“voracity” has
marked her
jouissance as
she
establishes
this signifier
when talking
about the
Edipic plot,
focusing on
the question
about
femininity as
“this way of
capitalist
functioning
which
pressures the
Superegotic
jouissance…”
The contrasting points
in these
presentations include: A hypermodern way
of the woman’s jouissance; a woman
that sees it all; a woman who eats it
all; the invitation to talk; what is not
possible to say; speaking of the
not-all. These counterpoints take us
through
the path of what psychoanalysis can
teach, what is known about women and what
Lacan knew about them. This pathway
leads us to the Symposium to which we
are
invited.
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário